Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:847-855
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lev, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Marmur, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lev, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Marmur, J. D.

Administration of abciximab to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide: effect on platelet function

Eli I. Lev, MDa, Julio I. Osende, MDa, Merwin F. Richard, MDa, Jonathan A. Robbinsa, Jenny A. Delfin, MDa, Oswaldo Rodriguez, MDa, Samin K. Sharma, MDa, Tim Jayasundera, MDa, Juan J. Badimon, PhDa and Jonathan D. Marmur, MDa

a The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Residual platelet function assessed by 20 µM ADP-induced aggregation (top) and flow cytometry analysis of fibrinogen-platelet binding (bottom) in 25 patients who received tirofiban followed by abciximab and in 10 patients who received only abciximab. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM percent of baseline aggregation. Administration of abciximab to tirofiban-treated patients caused a significant decrease in platelet function. Open square = tirofiban-abciximab group; solid circle = abciximab control group. Abx = abciximab; Maint = maintenance; Tir = tirofiban.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Photomicrographs of the cone and platelet analyzer results in a representative tirofiban-abciximab patient. This method assesses platelet deposition at a high shear rate, and the results are expressed as the percentage of total surface covered by platelets. Micrograph (A) was taken at baseline (12.1% coverage), (B) after tirofiban bolus (2.2% coverage) and (C) after abciximab bolus, when tirofiban was still being infused (0.1% coverage). All micrographs were taken at magnification x10.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Residual platelet function assessed by 20 µM ADP induced aggregation (top) and flow cytometry analysis of fibrinogen-platelet binding (bottom) in 10 patients who received eptifibatide followed by abciximab and in five patients who received only abciximab. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM percent of baseline aggregation. A significant decrease in platelet function after the abciximab bolus was evidenced only by the fibrinogen-binding assay. Open square = eptifibatide-abciximab group; solid circle = abciximab control group. Abx = abciximab; Ept = eptifibatide; Maint = maintenance.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Binding of the monoclonal antibodies Mab1 and Mab2 to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on platelets. Mab1 is displaced by abciximab, whereas Mab2 is displaced by small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM binding sites per platelet in four patients from the tirofiban-abciximab group (top) and four patients from the eptifibatide-abciximab group (bottom). The abciximab bolus caused a marked decrease in Mab1 binding and a concurrent increase in Mab2 binding in both groups. Open square = Mab1; solid circle = Mab2. Abx = abciximab; Ept = eptifibatide; Maint = maintenance; Tir = tirofiban.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement