Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:808-817
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Götte, M. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Götte, M. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, C. A.

Quantification of regional contractile function after infarction: strain analysis superior to wall thickening analysis in discriminating infarct from remote myocardium

Marco J. W. Götte, MD* d, Albert C. van Rossum, MD, PhD* d, Jos W. R. Twisk, PhD{dagger} d, Joost P. A. Kuijer, MSc{ddagger} d, J. Tim Marcus, PhD{ddagger} d and Cees A. Visser, MD, PhD* d

* Department of Cardiology, University Hospital ("Vrije Universiteit"), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
{dagger} EMGO Institute, University Hospital ("Vrije Universiteit"), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Clinical Physics and Informatics, University Hospital ("Vrije Universiteit"), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
d Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands



View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Calculation of two-dimensional WT and strain on short-axis cine MR images (A) and tagged images (B), respectively. The end-diastolic images are shown on the left and the end-systolic images on the right. For calculation of WT, the centerline method was used. The white arrow (a) is one of the 100 chords, representing the end-diastolic WT. The other white arrow (a') represents the end-systolic WT at that point. According the formula (a' – a) x 100/a, the percent change in WT between end-diastole and end-systole can be calculated. On the tagged images, the white diamonds indicate the intersection points of the tagging grid. By using groups of three intersection points, multiple triangular elements of the myocardium can be created (C). The variables r and c both represent a line segment in the undeformed state, in the radial and circumferential directions, respectively. The variables r' and c' represent the same line segment in the deformed state. (For the two-dimensional strain computation of a triangle, see Appendix.) MR = magnetic resonance; WT = wall thickness.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Schematic definition of circumferential segments at the basal level (top), mid-ventricular level (middle) and apical level (bottom). The perfusion territory of the LAD was considered to be at the basal level in segments 10 to 3, at the mid level in segments 9 to 3 and at the apical level in segments 9 to 4. The infarct-related area is indicated by the dashed segments, the adjacent area by the solid segments and the remote area by the open segments. LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Contractile function in patients with MI in the infarct-related and remote myocardium, as quantified by WTh analysis and strain analysis. Strain analysis revealed significant differences in contractile function between infarct-related and remote myocardium, whereas WTh did not. {epsilon}r = radial stretch; MI = myocardial infarction; WTh = wall thickening.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 (A), The percent WTh in 12 circumferential segments at the midventricular level in patients and control subjects. The strain variables, {epsilon}r (B) and {epsilon}c (C). In the control group, the mean value (thick dashed line with diamonds) ± 2 SD (thin dashed lines) is shown. In the infarct group, the mean value (thick line with triangles) is shown. Despite the fact that all patients had a major MI, in none of the 12 segments, the mean WTh (expressed as a percentage) in the infarct group was below the mean values ± 2 SD of the control group. For {epsilon}r and {epsilon}c, the same four segments were found to have reduced function, as compared with that of the control subjects. These segments were highly concordant with the septal and anterior regions of the ventricle (i.e., perfusion territory of the LAD) (see Fig. 2). {epsilon}c = circumferential shortening; {epsilon}r = radial stretch; LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; WTh = wall thickening.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Correlation between global ventricular function, expressed by EF, and regional contractile function (averaged for 36 segments), expressed by WTh (A), {epsilon}r (B) and {epsilon}c (C) (see text). {epsilon}c = circumferential shortening; {epsilon}r = radial stretch; WTh = wall thickening.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement