Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:793-799
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerisano, G.
Right arrow Articles by Antoniucci, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cerisano, G.
Right arrow Articles by Antoniucci, D.

Prognostic implications of restrictive left ventricular filling in reperfused anterior acute myocardial infarction

Giampaolo Cerisano, MDa, Leonardo Bolognese, MD, FESCa, Piergiovanni Buonamici, MDa, Renato Valenti, MDa, Nazario Carrabba, MDa, Emilio Vincenzo Dovellini, MDa, Paolo Domenico Pucci, MDa, Giovanni Maria Santoro, MD, FESCa and David Antoniucci, MDa

a Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cumulative survival rates for cardiac mortality (top graph) and for all major cardiac events (death, hospital admission for heart failure or myocardial infarction) (bottom graph).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Time course of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic (top left graph) and end-diastolic (top right graph) volume indexes (ESVI and EDVI, respectively) in the restrictive and nonrestrictive filling groups. Time course of LV systolic (SYS.) (bottom left graph) and diastolic (DIA.) (bottom right graph) eccentricity (ECC.) indexes in the restrictive and nonrestrictive filling groups. Analysis of variance: *p < 0.0005 vs. baseline within groups; {dagger}p < 0.001 between groups; {ddagger}p < 0.05 vs. one month within groups; §p < 0.05 vs. baseline within groups; ¶p < 0.005 vs. baseline and one month within groups.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement