Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:741-747
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimoni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimoni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, T. R.

Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography

Sarah Shimoni, MD*, William A. Zoghbi, MD, FACC*, Feng Xie, MD{dagger}, David Kricsfeld, BS{dagger}, Sherif Iskander, MD*, Lisa Gobar, MD{ddagger}, Issam A. Mikati, MD*, John Abukhalil, RT*, Mario S. Verani, MD, FACC*, Edward L. O’Leary, MD, FACC{dagger} and Thomas R. Porter, MD, FACC{dagger}

* Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
{ddagger} Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA



View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 An example of normal myocardial contrast enhancement and the corresponding single photon emission computed tomography during bicycle exercise. At low mechanical index and frame rate, uniform contrast enhancement is seen at rest and is more prominent during exercise. Less contrast is seen when imaging at high frame rate (systolic frame shown), because of more bubble destruction.

 


View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 An example of an inducible anteroseptal and apical wall motion abnormality and contrast defect (arrows) with accelerated intermittent imaging during supine bicycle stress. The corresponding SPECT defect, which extends into the midseptum, is shown. Display is similar to Figure 1. SPECT = single photon emission computed tomography.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Lateral wall myocardial contrast enhancement using accelerated intermittent imaging during treadmill exercise stress in two different patients. The top panels show normal basal lateral segment attenuation, while the bottom panels show the dynamic images in a patient with a lateral wall contrast defect. Note that the perfusion defect in the patient with a true defect (bottom panels) extended out to the distal segment of the lateral wall, which would be uncharacteristic of attenuation. ED = end-diastole; ES = end-systole.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement