Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:371-378
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chugh, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chugh, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B. J.

Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: clinical implications

Sumeet S. Chugh, MD, FACC*, Joseph L. Blackshear, MD, FACC{dagger}, Win-Kuang Shen, MD, FACC*, Stephen C. Hammill, MD, FACC* and Bernard J. Gersh, MB, DPhil, ChB, FACC*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in four natural history studies. CHS = Cardiovascular Health Study; W Australia = Western Australia. (From Feinberg et al. [4]; by permission of the American Medical Association).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Secular trends in the prevalence (percentage) of atrial fibrillation in subjects 65 to 84 years old in the Framingham study. (Data from Wolf et al. [13]).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Pathophysiologic mechanisms and associations between atrial fibrillation and stroke. EF = ejection fraction; LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle. (From Gersh [3]; by permission of Futura Publishing Company. Original figure, courtesy of J. H. Chesebro, MD).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Analysis of thromboembolic risk in three studies of patients with lone atrial fibrillation according to the number of risk factors for stroke and age. (From Gersh BJ, Antithrombotic therapy in nonrheumatic/nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1999;10:461–71. By permission of Futura Publishing Company).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Type of atrial fibrillation (Afib) at diagnosis and at last follow-up in Olmsted County patients age 60 years or younger and those older than 60 years. Among younger patients, 20% never had a recurrence, 58% had recurrent disease, and only 22% had chronic atrial fibrillation at follow-up. Among older patients, 67% were in chronic Afib at follow-up. (Data from Kopecky et al. [48,50]).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement