Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion
Matthew T. Roe, MD*,
E. Magnus Ohman, MD, FACC*,
Arthur C. P. Maas, MD*,
Robert H. Christenson, PhD ,
Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD*,
Christopher B. Granger, MD, FACC*,
Robert A. Harrington, MD, FACC*,
Robert M. Califf, MD, FACC* and
Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, FACC*
* Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Pathophysiology of microvascular dysfunction after epicardial perfusion.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Stages of successful reperfusion depicted with angiographic techniques. As epicardial patency is re-established, tissue perfusion is restored if microvascular damage is not present. Adapted from Davies and Ormerod (6), with permission.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Temporal pattern of creatine kinase (CK) release after fibrinolysis for successful (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3) and unsuccessful (TIMI flow grade 0) reperfusion. Reproduced from Zabel et al. (44), with permission.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Temporal pattern of ST segment resolution after fibrinolysis, with continuous 12-lead ST segment monitoring. Cyclic patency of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is depicted by intermittent ST segment re-elevation.
|
|
|