Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:258-261
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilkis, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hasanah, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilkis, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hasanah, I.

The Amplatzer duct occluder: experience in 209 patients

Aziz A. Bilkis, MDa, Mazeni Alwi, MRCPa, Samion Hasri, MDa, Abdul L. Haifa, MDa, Kandhavello Geetha, MRCPa, Muhammad A. Rehman, MDa and Ishak Hasanah, MDa

a Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institut Jantung Negara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia



View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (A) A retention disc of the device sitting on the rim of the ductal ampulla. The ductus is completely occluded. This device is not likely to embolize. (B) A completely occluded ductus but the device size is too small. The retention device slanted forward into the body of the ductus, giving rise to the ‘bump’ (arrow). This device embolized to the right pulmonary artery at 24 h after implant assessment.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement