Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:208-214
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flores-Ramirez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagueh, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flores-Ramirez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagueh, S. F.

Echocardiographic insights into the mechanisms of relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Ramiro Flores-Ramirez, MDa, Nasser M. Lakkis, MD, FACCa, Katherine J. Middleton, RCTa, Donna Killip, RNa, William H. Spencer, III, MD, FACCa and Sherif F. Nagueh, MD, FACCa

a Department of Medicine, Cardiology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA



View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Parasternal long-axis view (LAX) of left ventricular outflow tract at baseline and six months after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy (NSRT). Note the thinning of the septal base and the widening of the outflow tract.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Relation of the change in left ventricular outflow tract gradient to that in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter (left) and end-diastolic mitral septal distance (right) as observed in the initial population. AML = anterior mitral leaflet.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relation of the change in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient to that in the angle between left ventricular systolic flow and mitral leaflets as observed in the initial population. AML = anterior mitral leaflet.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Relation of the change in left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOT) to that in peak acceleration rate (left) and acceleration time/ejection time (AT/ET) (right) in the initial population.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Pulse Doppler recordings of left ventricular systolic flow at a point 2.5 cm apical to the mitral valve. The left panel shows the baseline data with immediate changes after ethanol injection in the middle panel and the six-week results on the right. Notice the increase in acceleration time relative to ejection time. NSRT = nonsurgical septal reduction therapy.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Relation of the change in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient acutely in the catheterization laboratory to that in peak acceleration rate (left) and acceleration time/ejection time (AC/ET) (right) in the test population.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Relation of the change in left ventricular outflow tract gradient to that in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter (left) and end-diastolic mitral septal distance (right) six weeks after NSRT as observed in the test population. AML = anterior mitral leaflet.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement