Left ventricular mechanics during and after acute rheumatic fever: contractile dysfunction is closely related to valve regurgitation
Thomas L. Gentles, FRACP* b, ,d,
Steven D. Colan, MD, FACC ,d,
Nigel J. Wilson, MRCP* b,
Renelle Biosa* b and
John M. Neutze, MD, FRACP* b,d
* Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
b Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Department of Cardiology, Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
d Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of shortening relationships during acute rheumatic fever. The shaded area demarcated by the solid line indicates the normal range (mean ± 2 standard deviations). The dashed lines indicate extrapolation of the relationship to abnormal levels of end-systolic wall stress. Group I = no or mild aortic or mitral regurgitation; group II = moderate or severe aortic or mitral regurgitation (see text for details). ESSc = circumferential end-systolic wall stress; VCFC = rate corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 (A) Velocity of shortening-end-systolic wall stress relationship by regurgitant valve during acute rheumatic fever in group II patients. The shaded area indicates the normal range. (B) The stress-velocity relationships for the same patient group derived from (A). Large symbols and bars = mean ± one standard deviation. p values are derived from comparison with the normal population and between the two valve groups using the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test (see text for details). AR = aortic regurgitation; ESSc = circumferential end-systolic wall stress; MR = mitral regurgitation; VCFC = rate corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening.
|
|
|