Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1-8
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Keefe, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lavie, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Keefe, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lavie, C. J.

Should an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor be standard therapy for patients with atherosclerotic disease?

James H. O’Keefe, MD*, Mark Wetzel, MD*, Richard R. Moe, MD, PhD*, Kathleen Brosnahan, PharmD* and Carl J. Lavie, MD{dagger}

* Mid America Heart Institute, St. Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
{dagger} Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death in the HOPE study (5). The ramipril group did substantially better than the placebo group (relative risk 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.86).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Survival curves from the APRES study. The ramipril group experienced significantly fewer adverse cardiovascular events during the follow-up period (11).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement