Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:2247-2253
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gold, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gold, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, D. S.

A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification

Michael R. Gold, MD, PhD, FACC*, Daniel M. Bloomfield, MD, FACC{dagger}, Kelley P. Anderson, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Nabil E. El-Sherif, MD, FACC§, David J. Wilber, MD, FACC||, William J. Groh, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, N. A. Mark Estes, III, MD, FACC#, Elizabeth S. Kaufman, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, Mark L. Greenberg, MD, FACC** and David S. Rosenbaum, MD, FACC**

* Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
{dagger} Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
{ddagger} University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
§ Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
|| University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois, USA
# New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
** MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Risk stratification of ventricular tachyarrhythmic events. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are shown for each of the three tests evaluated. A: T-wave alternans; B: Signal averaged electrocardiography; C: Programmed ventricular stimulation. EPS = programmed ventricular stimulation during electrophysiology study; SAECG = signal averaged electrocardiogram; TWA = T-wave alternans.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The role of TWA for risk stratification in patients with known or suspected ventricular arrhythmias. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are shown based on TWA results. A: Ventricular tachyarrhythmic events is the end point. B: Ventricular tachyarrhythmic events or death is the end point. TWA = T-wave alternans.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement