Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1713-1719
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoit, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoit, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, M.

Influence of left ventricular dysfunction on the role of atrial contraction

An echocardiographic-hemodynamic study in dogs

Brian D. Hoit, BS, FACC* and Marjorie Gabel, BS{dagger}

* Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
{dagger} Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Box 670542, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, USA



View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Electrocardiograms before (left) and after (right) radiofrequency (RF) AV nodal ablation. Recordings from top to bottom are from the surface electrocardiogram (ECG), the distal electrode (A-V), and from the electrode across the bundle of His. The His bundle potentials are circled. Atrial and ventricular potentials correspond to the electrocardiographic P and QRS waves. Note the production of complete heart block on the right.

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Mitral flow in a representative animal at baseline (top left panel), and after one week of rapid atrial pacing at 400 beats/min (bottom left panel), two weeks of rapid ventricular pacing at 220 beats/min (top right panel), and both rapid atrial and ventricular pacing (bottom right panel). Recordings were obtained during atrioventricular sequential pacing at 80 beats/min. The "E" and "A" waves correspond to early ventricular diastole and left atrial systole, respectively. Doppler scale = 20 cm/s. See text for details.

 


View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Left atrial appendage flow in the representative animal shown in Figure 2 at baseline (top left panel), and after one week of rapid atrial pacing at 400 beats/min (bottom left panel), two weeks of rapid ventricular pacing at 220 beats/min (top right panel), and both rapid atrial and ventricular pacing (bottom right panel). Recordings were obtained during atrioventricular sequential pacing at 80 beats/min. The "e" and "a" waves correspond to early ventricular diastole and left atrial systole, respectively. Doppler scale = 20 cm/s. See text for details.

 


View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Pulmonary vein flow from the animal in Figures 2 and 3, again at baseline (top left panel), and after one week of rapid atrial pacing at 400 beats/min (bottom left panel), two weeks of rapid ventricular pacing at 220 beats/min (top right panel), and both rapid atrial and ventricular pacing (bottom right panel). Recordings were obtained during atrioventricular sequential pacing at 80 beats/min. J1 = early systolic flow; J2 = late systolic flow; K = diastolic flow. A prominent atrial reversal wave (A) is seen after rapid ventricular pacing. Doppler scale = 20 cm/s. Diastolic reversals in the lower two panels occur during isovolumic ventricular systole and are not pulmonary vein A velocities. See text for details.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement