cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1549-1556
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alfonso, F.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alfonso, F.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.

Fate of stent-related side branches after coronary intervention in patients with in-stent restenosis

Fernando Alfonso, MD, PhD, FESCa, Carlos Hernández, MDa, María José Pérez-Vizcayno, MDa, Rosana Hernández, MD, PhD, FESCa, Antonio Fernández-Ortíz, MD, PhD, FESCa, Javier Escaned, MD, PhD, FESCa, Camino Bañuelos, MD, FESCa, Manel Sabaté, MD, PhDa, Marcelo Sanmartín, MDa, Cristina Fernández, MDa and Carlos Macaya, MD, PhD, FESCa

a Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain



View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Angiogram in the left anterior oblique projection with cranial angulation showing a restenosed stent in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (a). The distal part of the stent spanned a disease-free septal branch (Type B) and a diagonal branch (arrow) with ostial involvement (Type A). After treatment (b) a good angiographic result was obtained in the left anterior descending coronary artery (parent vessel); the septal branch remained patent but the diagonal branch became occluded (asterisk). This occlusion was clinically silent. The six-month angiogram (c) revealed an adequate angiographic result on the left anterior descending coronary artery and patency (reappearance) of the diagonal branch (arrow).

 


View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Left panel. Angiogram in the right anterior oblique projection revealing a severe stenosis in the mid-left anterior descending coronary artery. (a) De novo lesion. (b) After initial stenting. (c) Stent restenosis (before treatment). (d) Immediately after treatment of in-stent restenosis (index procedure). (e) At six-month follow-up. A large diagonal branch and two small septal perforator side branches are always visualized. Right panel. Angiogram in the left anterior oblique projection with cranial angulation in a patient with a tight lesion in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (a to e, timing same as above). A diagonal branch—with severe ostium involvement—remained patent after initial stenting, occluded (without clinical sequelae) during treatment of in-stent restenosis (asterisk) and reappeared at follow-up (arrow).

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Flow diagram illustrating the occurrence of side-branch (SB) occlusion in relation to location (top) and SB classification (bottom). RVB = right ventricular branch; PL = posterolateral branch; ST = stent.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Clinical, procedural, and angiographic predictors of side-branch (SB) occlusion (top) and of SB flow deterioration (bottom). Crude (unadjusted) relative risks (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) are displayed in a logarithmic scale. Adj RR = adjusted relative risks; Ad Hoc = procedures performed during the diagnostic coronary angiogram; Ostial-D = ostial disease in the SB; R Length = restenosis length (studied per 1 mm of increment); B/A Ratio = balloon/artery ratio using quantitative angiography (>1.13, upper tertile); Device = use of any device different from balloon angioplasty; angle = adverse takeoff angulation of the SB; MLD = minimal lumen diameter of the parent vessel after intervention (per 1 mm of increment); ST1 = during initial stenting.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home