Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1467-1473
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Quyyumi, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Quyyumi, A. A.

Contribution of bradykinin receptor dysfunction to abnormal coronary vasomotion in humans

Abhiram Prasad, MBBS, MRCPa, Syed Husain, MDa, William Schenke, BSa, Rita Mincemoyer, RNa, Neal Epstein, MDa and Arshed A. Quyyumi, MD, FRCP, FACCa

a Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Comparison of BK and ACH-induced microvascular dilation. Bars represent patients from the three tertiles of ACH responses: low (<70%, n = 23), medium (70–130%, n = 23) and high (>130%, n = 22) increase in blood flow compared with baseline.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Effect of risk factors on ACH (30 µg/min) and SNP (40 g/min) induced coronary microvascular dilation measured as % change in coronary vascular resistance compared with baseline. *p < 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 compared with 0 risk factors. By analysis of variance, p = 0.025 for ACH and p > 0.1 for SNP responses between groups.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effect of risk factors on bradykinin-induced coronary epicardial dilation (measured as % change in diameter) and microvascular dilation (measured as % change in resistance). No difference in responses between risk groups by analysis of variance.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Bradykinin- (left) and acetylcholine- (right) mediated microvascular (top) and epicardial (bottom) vasomotion before (control solid circles with solid lines) and after L-NMMA (open circles with dashed lines, n = 20). *p = 0.03, **p = 0.003, ***p < 0.001 comparing control with L-NMMA. L-NMMA = L-NG monomethyl arginine.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Bradykinin-induced coronary epicardial dilation in segments that constricted (n = 20) and those that dilated (n = 30) with pacing. The difference between responses was compared using analysis of variance.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 (Top panel) Bradykinin-mediated epicardial vasomotion in patients with serum ACE levels > median value of 9.9 U/ml (high ACE, n = 30) compared with those with levels below median (low ACE, n = 32). (Lower panel) Bradykinin-mediated epicardial vasomotion in patients with DD (n = 13) genotype compared with patients with the ID or II genotypes (n = 49). The comparison between groups by analysis of variance. ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement