Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1404-1410
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peralta, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peralta, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, F. J.

The class III antiarrhythmic effect of sotalol exerts a reverse use-dependent positive inotropic effect in the intact canine heart

Adelqui O. Peralta, MDa, Roy M. John, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, FACCa, William H. Gaasch, MD, FACCa, Peter I. Taggart, MD, FRCP*, David T. Martin, MD, FRCP, FACCa and Ferdinand J. Venditti, MD, FACCa

a Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and Laser Research Laboratory, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
* University College, London, United Kingdom



View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Effect of sotalol on action potential duration and left ventricular pressure transients during steady state pacing. In the baseline state, an increase in the pacing cycle length (from 400 to 1,000 ms) produced a 40% increase in the action potential duration and a reduction in peak (+)dP/dt. After sotalol, an increase in the pacing cycle length produced a greater (48%) increase in the action potential duration and the decline in (+)dP/dt was markedly attenuated. dP/dt = time derivative of pressure; PCL = pacing cycle length.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Action potential duration (APD90) and left ventricular peak (+)dP/dt in steady state pacing experiments. As cycle length increased, action potential duration progressively increased in all three states. After sotalol, the APD was significantly longer than that seen during the baseline state and with esmolol (*p < 0.001; p < 0.001 for interaction). Left ventricular peak (+)dP/dt was higher with sotalol than it was with esmolol (significant at cycle lengths above 400 ms [*p < 0.001; p < 0.001 for interaction]); moreover, the inverse relation between peak (+)dP/dt and cycle length (seen in baseline and esmolol states) was abolished by sotalol.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relation between LV peak (+)dP/dt and action potential duration (APD90) during the steady state pacing experiments with sotalol and esmolol. In the sotalol experiments (left panel), there was a significant direct relation between APD and LV (+)dP/dt. By contrast, no such relation was seen in the esmolol experiments (right panel). LV = left ventricular.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Action potential duration (APD90) and left ventricular peak (+)dP/dt in single test pulse (restitution) experiments. Sotalol produced a substantial increase in the plateau phase of the electrical restitution curve. The APD with sotalol (at coupling intervals exceeding 400 ms) was significantly higher than that seen in the baseline state and with esmolol (p < 0.001; p < 0.001 for interaction). During the plateau phase of the mechanical restitution curve, left ventricular (+)dP/dt with sotalol exceeded that seen with esmolol at coupling intervals exceeding 600 ms (p < 0.01).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement