Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1396-1403
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kipshidze, N.
Right arrow Articles by Moses, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kipshidze, N.
Right arrow Articles by Moses, J. W.

Endoluminal reconstruction of the arterial wall with endothelial cell/glue matrix reduces restenosis in an atherosclerotic rabbit

Nicholas Kipshidze, MD, PhD, FACC, James J. Ferguson, III, MD, FACC§, Michael H. Keelan, Jr., MD, FACC*, Harry Sahota, MD{ddagger}, Richard Komorowski, MD*, Latha Raja Shankar, MD*, Paramjith S. Chawla, MD*, Christian C. Haudenschild, MD||, Victor Nikolaychik, MD{dagger} and Jeffrey W. Moses, MD, FACC

* Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
{dagger} Milwaukee Heart Project, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
{ddagger} Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA
§ Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
|| JH Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York, and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Percentage of cells attached to the vessel wall after endothelial cell/glue application and exposition to blood flow. Efficiency of attachment was calculated from intensity of fluorescent stain PKm-26 extracted from the transplanted cells.

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Fluorescent micrograph of fluorescent labeled transplanted endothelial cells 4 h after vascular reconstruction. Cross-section of rabbit iliac artery. Note the new endothelial layer. L = lumen; M = media; NE = new endothelial cell/glue layer.

 


View larger version (148K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Scanning electron micrograph of rabbit iliac artery 4 h after treatment. Distal segment of the rabbit iliac artery treated with endothelial cell/glue matrix. (Original magnification x 400.) Note transplanted endothelial cells within fibrin matrix on the surface of the iliac artery. The endothelial cells are in the process of attachment. In the areas not covered by glue/cell matrix, the subendothelium is exposed and debris is seen. C = untreated segment; NE = new endothelial cell/glue matrix.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Movat’s stain. (A) Iliac artery of cholesterol-fed rabbit 60 days after balloon injury and local saline (control) application. Cross-section shows representative fibrocellular hyperplasia with focal macrophage/foam cell accumulation in the core. Waviness of both remaining internal and external laminae is suggestive of a remodeling process leading to shrinkage. (B) Contralateral iliac artery of the same animal after balloon injury and local application of glue. Cross-section shows comparable initial mechanical injury with fibrocellular hyperplasia without significant foam cell accumulation. Little inflammation and no angiogenesis are seen, but the tunica adventitia displays some reinforcing collagenous thickening in the upper left quadrant. (C) and (D) Iliac arteries from another cholesterol fed animal 60 days after procedure. On both iliac there is neointima around the entire circumference, but the internal elastic lamina is intact, and the original tunica media shows intimal cell loss and little compression, indicating that in these positions the initial injuries were present, symmetric and comparable. (C) The segment treated with endothelial cell seeding shows a concentric lesion with the fibrocellular intimal hyperplasia. (D) Local treatment with glue/cell reconstruction results in a minimal fibrocellular hyperplasia with little variation in thickness mostly due to the previous neointima. (A) to (D) Movat stain all taken with a digital camera at the same magnification and further processed with photofinish 4. L = lumen; M = media; N = neointima.

 


View larger version (141K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 (A) Example of a severe lesion from another animal showing a significant breaking of the internal elastic lamina, the media and external elastic lamina, with very extensive neointimal hyperplasia and formation of a lipid rich core 60 days after treatment with endothelial cell seeding procedure. (B) Contralateral artery from the same animal with comparable level of injury. The intima in this glue/cell treated segment is moderate and hypercellular in nature.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement