HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pibarot, P. Articles by Dumesnil, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pibarot, P. Articles by Dumesnil, J. G.

Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention

^a Quebec Heart Institute/Laval Hospital, Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

View larger version (23K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 Relations between mean transvalvular pressure gradients and indexed effective orifice areas for aortic bioprostheses studied in vitro in a physiologic pulse duplicator system, assuming a normal cardiac index of 3.0 liter/min per m2 at rest and 10% to 50% increases in stroke volume, as may occur during maximal upright exercise. (Reproduced with permission from Dumesnil and Yoganathan [4].)

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Figure 2 Postoperative mean transvalvular gradient (A) and cardiac index (B) as a function of the interval since prosthesis implantation (years) in patients with an indexed effective orifice area, at implantation, of 0.65 cm2/m2 (closed triangle pointing down, n = 5), 0.66 to 0.85 cm2/m2 (closed triangle pointing up, n = 29), 0.86 to 1.05 cm2/m2 (open triangle pointing up, n = 29) and >1.05 cm2/m2 (open triangle pointing down, n = 9). *Significant difference between patients with an indexed valve area 0.85 or >0.85 cm2/m2. Data are expressed as the mean value ± SEM. (Reproduced with permission from Pibarot et al. [6].)

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Figure 3 Correlation between mean transvalvular gradient and indexed effective orifice area in patients with a stented bioprosthesis (solid circles, n = 51), a stentless bioprosthesis (open circles, n = 194), an aortic homograft (open triangles, n = 55) or a pulmonary autograft (open boxes, n = 96). Panels A and B show this relation for mean gradient measured at rest in all patients and during maximal exercise in a subgroup of 48 patients, respectively. Several points are overlapped.