JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:706-712
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shlipak, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shlipak, M. G.

Treatment and outcomes of left bundle-branch block patients with myocardial infarction who present without chest pain

Michael G. Shlipak, MD, MPH* {dagger}, Alan S. Go, MD{dagger} {ddagger}, Paul D. Frederick, MPH, MBA§, Judith Malmgren, PhD§, Hal V. Barron, MD, FACC{dagger} ||, John G. Canto, MD, MSPH, FACC for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators

* San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
{dagger} University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
{ddagger} the Northern California Kaiser Division of Research, Oakland, CaliforniaUSA
§ the University of Washington Clinical Research Coordinating Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
|| the Division of Medical Affairs, Genentech, San Francisco, California, USA
the University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The association of the absence of chest pain with in-hospital mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. The mortality risk associated with the absence of chest pain is calculated in a series of multivariate adjustments. Model 1 is adjusted for differences in patient demographic characteristics and past medical history. Model 2 includes variables from Model 1 and adds severity of illness characteristics. Model 3 adjusts for the above variables, hospital bed assignment and medications and procedures received in-hospital.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.