Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:461-467
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lebowitz, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lebowitz, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Devereux, R. B.

Prevalence and correlates of aortic regurgitation in american indians: the Strong Heart Study

Nathaniel E. Lebowitz, MDa, Jonathan N. Bella, MDa, Mary J. Roman, MD, FACCa, Jennifer E. Liu, MDa, Dawn P. Fishman, BAa, Mary Paranicas, BAa, Elisa T. Lee, PhD*, Richard R. Fabsitz, MA, MPH{dagger}, Thomas K. Welty, MD{ddagger}, Barbara V. Howard, PhD§ and Richard B. Devereux, MD, FACCa

a Department of Medicine, The New York Hospital–Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
* School of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
{dagger} National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
{ddagger} Aberdeen Area Tribal Chairman’s Health Board, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA
§ Medlantic Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The prevalences of both mild (1+) AR (solid bars) and more severe (≥2+) AR (open bars) in Strong Heart Study participants show strong positive correlations to increasing age (p < 0.001).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The prevalences of both mild (1+) AR (solid bars) and more severe (≥2+) AR (open bars) show progressive increases from individuals with no AS to those with mild AS to those with moderate or severe AS (p < 0.001).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The prevalences of both mild (1+) AR (solid bars) and more severe (≥2+) AR (open bars) were substantially higher (p < 0.001) in individuals with bicuspid as opposed to trileaflet aortic valves.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 The prevalences of both mild (1+) AR (solid bars) and more severe (≥2+) AR (open bars) were higher (p < 0.01) in individuals with thickened aortic valve cusps versus cusps of normal thickness.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement