cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:242-249
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Momomura, S.-i.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Momomura, S.-i.

End-tidal CO2 pressure decreases during exercise in cardiac patients

Association with severity of heart failure and cardiac output reserve

Akihiro Matsumoto, MDa, Haruki Itoh, MD, FACC*, Yoko Eto, MDa, Toshio Kobayashi, MD*, Makoto Kato, MD*, Masao Omata, MDa, Hiroshi Watanabe, MD*, Kazuzo Kato, MD, FACC* and Shin-ichi Momomura, MDa

a Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
* Internal Medicine, the Cardiovascular Institute, Tokyo, Japan



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 End-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) at rest and during exercise according to the NYHA functional class. There was a significant difference in the change of PETCO2 during exercise among the four groups at each time point (one way-ANOVA at each time point: rest p = 0.0016, 20 W p = 0.0001, 30 W p = 0.0001, AT p = 0.0001, RC p = 0.0001, Peak p = 0.0001). AT indicates anaerobic threshold; RC = respiratory compensation point; P = peak exercise. Values are mean ± SE. *p < 0.05 versus controls.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 End-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) at rest and during exercise in relation to CO2 output (CO2), minute ventilation (E), tidal volume (VT), and respiratory rate (RR) at rest (R), during 20 W warming-up (WU), at anaerobic threshold (AT), at respiratory compensation point (RC), and at peak exercise (P) according to the NYHA functional class. Values are mean ± SE.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 End-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) in relation to the cardiac index (CI) at rest, at 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W during exercise according to the NYHA functional class. Values are mean ± SE.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Relationships of end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) at the respiratory compensation (RC) point with the cardiac index at peak exercise in 112 cardiac patients and 29 normal subjects. Dotted lines indicate mean–2SD values of PETCO2 at the respiratory compensation point and the cardiac index at peak exercise in the normal control subjects.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Relationships of end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) at the respiratory compensation (RC) point with O2 uptake (O2) at peak exercise, or with the slope of minute ventilation-CO2 output (E-CO2 slope) in 112 cardiac patients and 29 normal subjects.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 End-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) and arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) at rest and during exercise in 53 cardiac patients and 15 normal control subjects. There was a significant difference in the change between PaCO2 and PETCO2 variables and interaction with time in both the patients (variables p = 0.0001, interaction p = 0.0001, by ANOVA) and control subjects (variables p = 0.0001, interaction p = 0.0001, by ANOVA). Peak indicates peak exercise. Values are mean ± SE. *; p < 0.05 versus normal controls. {dagger}; p < 0.05 versus PaCO2.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Relationships of end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) at the respiratory compensation point with the ratio of physiologic dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) in 53 cardiac patients and 15 normal control subjects.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home