This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nieuwland, W. Articles by Rispens, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nieuwland, W. Articles by Rispens, P.

Differential effects of high-frequency versus low-frequency exercise training in rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease

Wybe Nieuwland, MD^*, Marike A. Berkhuysen, PhD , Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, MD, PhD, FACC^*, Johan Brügemann, MD, PhD^*, Martin L. J. Landsman, MD, PhD^*, Eric van Sonderen, PhD, K. I. Lie, MD, PhD^||, Harry J. G. M. Crijns, MD, PhD^* and Piet Rispens, MD, PhD

^* Department of Cardiology/Thoraxcenter, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Department Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Emory Heartwise Risk Reduction Program, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Northern Center for Health Care Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
^|| Department of Cardiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. %

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 Percentage of patients with a significant improvement during cardiac rehabilitation on the following parameters: peak VO2 = peak oxygen consumption; SPhF = quality of life assessed as subjective physical functioning; VAT = ventilatory anaerobic threshold; Wmax = maximal workload. *Significant difference (p < 0.01). Solid bar = high frequency; open bar = low frequency.