Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:185-193
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guazzi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Guazzi, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guazzi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Guazzi, M. D.

How the left and right sides of the heart, as well as pulmonary venous drainage, adapt to an increasing degree of head-up tilting in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: differences from the normal heart

Marco Guazzi, MD, PhD, FACCa, Anna Maltagliati, MDa, Gloria Tamborini, MDa, Fabrizio Celeste, MDa, Mauro Pepi, MDa, Manuela Muratori, MDa, Marco Berti, MDa and Maurizio D. Guazzi, MD, PhDa

a Istituto di Cardiologia dell’Universita’ degli Studi, Centro Cardiologico, I.R.C.C.S., Centro di Studio Ricerche Cardiovascolari del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano, Italy



View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Row data traces illustrating the typical pattern of transmitral and pulmonary vein flow velocities in the supine position and at 60° tilting for one control subject and one patient with HCM.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Right ventricular end-diastolic area (open square = control subjects; solid squares = patients with HCM) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (open circles = control subjects; solid circles = patients with HCM) in the supine position and at different degrees of head-up tilting. #p < 0.01 vs. supine position. *p < 0.01 vs. corresponding value in control subjects. **p < 0.01 vs. immediately lower tilting degree.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress and fiber fractional shortening in control subjects and patients with HCM. Each symbol represents the mean value in the following conditions: supine (solid square); 20° at 1 min (open diamond); 20° at 10 min (solid diamond); 40° at 1 min (open triangle); 40° at 10 min (solid triangle); 60° at 1 min (open circle); and 60° at 10 min (solid circle). Each bar represents 1 SD.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement