Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:151-158
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamdan, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamdan, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. L.

Increased sympathetic activity after atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

Mohamed H. Hamdan, MD, FACCa, Richard L. Page, MD, FACCa, Clifford J. Sheehan, MDa, Jason D. Zagrodzky, MDa, Stephen L. Wasmund, BS*, Karthik Ramaswamy, MDa, Jose A. Joglar, MDa and Michael L. Smith, PhD*

a University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
* Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas, USA



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Sample tracings of integrated SNA, femoral artery pressure and ablation catheter. These tracings show a 20-s period before the onset of RF ablation (RFA) and ~40 s of RF ablation without AV block. The arrow indicates the onset of RF ablation. No significant changes in arterial pressure or SNA were produced by unsuccessful RF ablation (see Table 2).

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Sample tracings of integrated SNA, femoral artery pressure and surface ECG for one patient. The periods shown include a baseline period (during AF) just before the beginning of RF ablation and during RF ablation (arrow on ECG panel) in which AV block was achieved within 10 s, 10 min after AV block (pacing at 60 beats/min) and 12 min after AV block (pacing at 90 beats/min).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Mean (±SEM) arterial pressures and SNA levels for all 10 patients at baseline (with atrial fibrillation [AFib]), during RF ablation (RFA) with AV block (first minute) and 10 min after AV block was achieved. Asterisks indicate significant differences from baseline (p < 0.05).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Mean (±SEM) arterial pressures and SNA levels for all 10 patients during pacing rates of 60 and 90 beats/min after complete AV node block was achieved by RF ablation. The data for pacing at 60 beats/min were collected immediately before pacing at 90 beats/min. Asterisks indicate significant differences between pacing rates (p < 0.05).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Monophasic action potential recordings obtained from the MAP catheter positioned at the RV apex during pacing at 120 beats/min. Top, Before ablation, APD90 was 229 ms and ERP was 200 ms, with evidence of capture at a coupling interval equal to 210 ms. Bottom, After ablation, APD90 increased to 258 ms and premature stimuli delivered at a coupling interval of 220 ms failed to capture. The ERP increased from 200 ms before ablation to 220 ms after ablation.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement