Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1760-1768
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arbustini, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tavazzi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arbustini, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tavazzi, L.

Prevalence and characteristics of dystrophin defects in adult male patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Eloisa Arbustini, MD*, Marta Diegoli, BD*, Patrizia Morbini, MD*, Barbara Dal Bello, MD*, Nadia Banchieri, BD*, Andrea Pilotto, TD*, Filippo Magani, TD*, Maurizia Grasso, PhD{dagger}, Jagat Narula, MD{ddagger}, Antonello Gavazzi, MD§, Mario Viganò, MD|| and Luigi Tavazzi, MD§

* Pathology Department, IRCCS-Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
§ Cardiology Department, IRCCS-Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
|| Cardiac Surgery Department Departments, IRCCS-Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
{dagger} Transplantation Experimental Laboratory, IRCCS-Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
{ddagger} Allegheny University of Health Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Graph showing the prevalence of dystrophin defects-associated dilated cardiomyopathies in the overall series of 201 consecutive male patients, grouped by decades of age. Gray bar = DCM; Black bar = dystrophin defect DCM. DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Microsatellite analysis of families of probands 2 and 13. In the family of proband 2, four microsatellites were informative. In the family of proband 13, six microsatellites were informative. Sisters of both probands were shown to be noncarriers.

 


View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Light micrographs from frozen sections of endomyocardial biopsy from patient #13, with deletions of exons 6–8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 44. The immunostain of rod domain (a) and N-terminus (c) is almost absent: only sporadic, possibly revertant fibers retain immunoreactivity; the expression of C-terminus is discontinuous or absent in some cells (b). Alpha (d) and gamma (e) sarcoglycan immunostains show focal interruptions and irregular intensity; beta dystroglycan (f) only shows minimal decrease. Merosin (g) is normally expressed. (Fluorescein-conjugated rabbit antimouse antibodies; a–g 280x, reduced by 60%).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement