Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1622-1627
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chowienczyk, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chowienczyk, P. J.

Inhibitory effects of low-density lipoproteins from men with type II diabetes on endothelium-dependent relaxation

Karen L. McNeill*, Luigi Fontana, MD*, David L. Russell-Jones, FRCP{dagger}, Iris Rajman, PhD*, James M. Ritter, FRCP* and Philip J. Chowienczyk, FRCP*

* Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, King’s College, London, United Kingdom



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Forearm blood flow during brachial artery infusion of acetylcholine (7.5, 15 and 30 µg/min) and nitroprusside (1, 3 and 10 µg/min) in healthy control men (n = 10, open squares) and men with type II diabetes (n = 10, closed squares). p < 0.01 for the comparison of blood flow responses to acetylcholine in men with type II diabetes compared with those in control subjects by ANOVA for repeated measures.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Bioassay system to examine effects of n-LDL isolated from men with type II diabetes (n = 10, closed squares) and control subjects (n = 10, open squares) on endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine (ACh) in rabbit aortic rings preconstricted with noradrenaline. Relaxation in absence of n-LDL is shown in open circles. p value refers to comparison of inhibitory effects of n-LDL from men with type II diabetes with those of n-LDL from control subjects by ANOVA for repeated measures.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Inhibitory effects of n-LDL isolated from control men (n = 10, open bars) and men with type II diabetes (n = 10, shaded bars) on relaxation of rabbit rings to acetylcholine. Percent inhibition refers to the difference between the sum of relaxations to all doses to acetylcholine in the absence and presence of n-LDL. p < 0.01 for the difference between effects of n-LDL from controls and diabetics.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Effects of n-LDL isolated from men with type II diabetes (n = 10, closed squares) and control subjects (n = 10, open squares) on endothelium-independent relaxation to sodium nitroprusside in rabbit aortic rings preconstricted with noradrenaline. Relaxation in absence of n-LDL is shown in open circles.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement