Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1607-1615
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aptecar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dubois-Randé, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aptecar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dubois-Randé, J.-L.

Effects of bradykinin on coronary blood flow and vasomotion in transplant patients

Eduardo Aptecar, MD* {dagger}, Emmanuel Teiger, MD* {dagger}, Patrick Dupouy, MD* {dagger}, Christophe Benvenuti, MD{ddagger}, Morton J. Kern, MD§, Javier Woscoboinik, MD{dagger}, Said Sediame, MD{dagger}, Jean Marc Pernes, MD{dagger}, Alain Castaigne, MD*, Daniel Loisance, MD{ddagger} and Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé, MD*

* Fédération de Cardiologie et Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U400, Créteil, France
{dagger} Unité d’Hémodynamique et de Cardiologie Interventionnelle, Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles, Créteil, France
{ddagger} Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardio-vasculaire et Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique URA 1431, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
§ St. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Plots show changes in coronary epicardial diameter, average peak velocity (APV) and calculated coronary blood flow, all expressed as the percent of baseline (mean ± SD) in response to increasing doses of bradykinin and acetylcholine, and to 1mg of linsidomine (Sin-1). BK 1, 2 and 3: bradykinin in doses of 50, 150 and 250 ng/min. ACh 1, 2 and 3: acetylcholine at estimated coronary blood concentrations of 10-8, 10-7 and 10-6 M. § p < 0.0001 transplant patients versus control subjects.

 


View larger version (152K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Four left coronary artery cineangiographic frames in right anterior oblique view from a single transplant patient are displayed. As compared with baseline (top left), marked epicardial vasodilation was observed at the peak of the highest bradykinin infusion dose (BK, 250 ng/min) (top right) as well as 3 min after a 1-mg intracoronary bolus of linsidomine (Sin-1) (bottom right). On the contrary, marked epicardial vasoconstriction occurred at the peak of the highest acetylcholine infusion dose (ACh, 10-6 M) (bottom left). The simultaneous recording of coronary blood flow velocity with the corresponding value of the average peak velocity (APV) is shown under each angiographic frame.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effects of bradykinin (BK) and acetylcholine (ACh) on coronary blood flow in eight transplant patients with and eight without allograft rejection (grades 2 and 3 of the ISHLT classification). Rejection did not impair the dose-dependent increase in coronary blood flow induced by bradykinin. On the contrary, the acetylcholine-induced increase in coronary blood flow was significantly lower (*p < 0.05) in the presence of rejection. Open circles = no rejection; black circles = rejection.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement