Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1516-1524
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by French, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by White, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by French, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by White, H. D.

Relationship between corrected TIMI frame counts at three weeks and late survival after myocardial infarction

John K. French, MB, PhDa, Thomas A. Hyde, MBa, Ivan T. Straznicky, MBa, Jacqueline Andrews, MBa, Mayanna Lund, MBa, David J. Amos, MBa, Andrew Zambanini, MBa, Christopher J. Ellis, MBa, Bruce J. Webber, DSRa, Stephanie C. McLaughlin, PhDa, Ralph M. L. Whitlock, MBa, Samuel O. M. Manda, PhDa, Hitesh Patel, MBa and Harvey D. White, MB, DSc, FACCa

a Cardiology Department, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Late actuarial outcome after myocardial infarction.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Infarct-related artery flow in patients who underwent angiography at three weeks without imputation for early death. (A) Comparison of CTFCs and TIMI flow grades. (B) Influence of CTFC on late survival. The log rank comparisons (four-way) at one, five and 10 years were p = 0.06, p = 0.002 and p = 0.26, respectively. (C) Influence of TIMI flow grades on late survival. The log rank comparisons (three-way) at one, five and 10 years were p = 0.03, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.14, respectively. The log rank comparisons (two-way) between TIMI 3 and TIMI 0 to 1 and between TIMI 3 and TIMI 0 to 2 at one, five and 10 years were p = 0.009, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.049; and p = 0.025, p = 0.004 and p = 0.49, respectively. The log rank comparisons between TIMI 2 and TIMI 0 to 1 at one, five and 10 years were p = 0.25, p = 0.047 and p = 0.25, respectively. The log rank comparisons between TIMI 0 to 1 and TIMI 2 to 3 at one, five, and 10 years were p = 0.012, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.049, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with TIMI 2 and TIMI 3 flow. The results were similar when only thrombolytic-treated patients were analyzed (data not shown). CTFC = corrected TIMI frame count; TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Influence of the CTFC on cardiac death. (A) At one year. (B) At five years. (C) At 10 years. The cumulative frequency is the percentage of patients with a CTFC not exceeding the X-value. CTFC = corrected TIMI frame count; TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement