Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1470-1477
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shen, W.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Hammill, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shen, W.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Hammill, S. C.

Distinct hemodynamic profiles in patients with vasovagal syncope: a heterogeneous population

Win-Kuang Shen, MD, FACC*, Phillip A. Low, MD{dagger}, Robert F. Rea, MD, FACC*, Christine M. Lohse, BS{ddagger}, David O. Hodge, MS{ddagger} and Stephen C. Hammill, MD, FACC*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Peripheral Neuropathy Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{ddagger} Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Percent of change of cardiomotor and vasomotor response to tilt. (A) Percentage change of heart rate, stroke volume and cardiac output from baseline supine to tilt position (70°) in the three groups of subjects: controls, tilt-positive patients and isoproterenol-positive patients. (B) Percentage change in systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure (BP) and total peripheral resistance from supine to tilt position. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Cardiomotor function and response to isoproterenol between control subjects and isoproterenol-positive patients. (A) Percentage change in heart rate, stroke volume and cardiac output during isoproterenol infusion (0.05 µg/kg per min) in the supine position compared with baseline supine position. (B) Percentage change in heart rate, stroke volume and cardiac output during isoproterenol infusion from supine to tilt position.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Vasomotor function in response to isoproterenol. (A) Percentage change in systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure (BP) and total peripheral resistance during isoproterenol infusion in supine position compared with baseline supine position. (B) Percentage change in systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and total peripheral resistance during isoproterenol infusion from supine to tilt position. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement