Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1152-1161
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cwajg, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zoghbi, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cwajg, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zoghbi, W. A.

End-diastolic wall thickness as a predictor of recovery of function in myocardial hibernation

Relation to rest-redistribution Tl-201 tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography

Jucylea M. Cwajg, MDa,1, Eduardo Cwajg, MDa, Sherif F. Nagueh, MD, FACCa, Zuo-Xiang He, MDa, Usman Qureshi, MD, FACCa, Leopoldo I. Olmos, MDa, Miguel A. Quinones, MD, FACCa, Mario S. Verani, MD, FACCa, William L. Winters, MD, MACCa and William A. Zoghbi, MD, FACCa

a Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Methodist Hospital Echocardiography and Nuclear Cardiology Laboratories, Houston, Texas, USA



View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Parasternal long axis (left upper panel), short axis at the base and midventricle (middle and right upper panels) and apical views (lower panels) showing location of measurements of end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) in the various myocardial segments (see text) in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy evaluated for myocardial viability. The inferior septum (at the base and midventricle) was not measured separately for the purposes of matching segments with Tl-201 scintigraphy. Parasternal windows usually provided a better resolution of basal and midventricular segments, whereas the apical windows allowed measurements of apical segments, in addition to others. As can be seen, EDWT of the apex was the most difficult to measure (see text) and was not recorded in this patient.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Relation of rest wall motion to end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) and rest-redistribution thallium-201 uptake. NL = normal; Hypk = hypokinesia; Ak = akinesia; Dysk = dyskinesia.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Scatter plot of individual measurements of end-diastolic wall thickness and maximum Tl-201 uptake in segments with and without recovery of systolic function after revascularization.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves for prediction of recovery of function after revascularization with end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) and rest-redistribution Tl-201 uptake before revascularization.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 End-diastolic wall thickness at baseline grouped according to maximum Tl-201 uptake and contractile reserve during dobutamine echocardiography prior to revascularization.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Diagram of the outcome of severely dysfunctional myocardial segments after revascularization grouped by end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) and contractile reserve to dobutamine. Rec = recovery of function.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Sensitivity (black bars) and specificity (shaded bars) for recovery of function after revascularization using end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT), rest-redistribution thallium uptake, and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) responses.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement