Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:907-914
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pocock, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pocock, S. J.

Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trial{ddagger}

Stuart J. Pocock, PhDa, Robert A. Henderson, MRCP*, Tim Clayton, MSca* {dagger}, Gary H. Lyman, FRCPa* {dagger}, Douglas A. Chamberlain, CBE, FRCP{dagger} for the RITA-2 Trial Participants

a Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
* Department of Cardiology, City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Quality of life by treatment group over three years of follow-up: Mean ± SEM SF-36 scores for eight quality-of-life aspects at baseline, three months, one year and three years.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Mean ± SEM scores for physical functioning, vitality and general health at one year, plotted by angina grade at one year, separately for each treatment group.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement