JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:19-28
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Heuvel, A. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crijns, H. J. G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Heuvel, A. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crijns, H. J. G. M.

Regional myocardial blood flow reserve impairment and metabolic changes suggesting myocardial ischemia in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Ad F. M. van den Heuvel, MDa, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, MD, PhD, FACCa, Ernst E. van der Wall, MD, PhD, FACC*, Paul K. Blanksma, MD, PhDa, Hans-Marc J. Siebelink, MDa, Willem M. Vaalburg, PhD{dagger}, Wiek H. van Gilst, PhDa and Harry J. G. M. Crijns, MD, Phda

a Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
* Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
{dagger} National Positron Emission Tomography Center, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands



View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Example of PET polar maps. In healthy volunteers (three polar maps at right) MBF reserve (top polar map; 280% = ratio 2.8) and 18FDG uptake (middle polar map; 51 µmol/min per 100 g) are more or less homogeneously distributed throughout the left ventricle. The PET polar maps in a patient with IDC (three polar maps at left) show confluent regions with mismatch (bottom polar map) (i.e., impaired flow reserve [top polar map; mean 210% = ratio 2.1]) paralleled by increased 18FDG uptake (mean 60 µmol/min per 100 g). Flow reserve units are percent hyperemic blood flow related to rest blood flow. Mismatch units are presented as standard deviations of a normal data base. A = anterior; L = lateral; I = inferior; S = septal.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Global myocardial blood flow at rest (dark hatched bars) and after dipyridamole infusion (open bars) in patients with CHF and IDC and in control subjects. #p < 0.05 delta flow in healthy volunteers versus patients with IDC.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Global MBF reserve in control subjects and in patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes II and III. *p < 0.05.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Correlation between global MBF during dipyridamole infusion and LV systolic wall stress in patients with IDC.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 A, Correlation between global MBF reserve and 11C-acetate clearance rate ratio (ratio of 11C-acetate clearance rates during dobutamine infusion and clearance rates at rest). Note that low dose dobutamine infusion did not exhaust the dipyridamole-determined MBF reserve. B, Correlation between global 11C-acetate clearance rate (kmono = oxygen consumption) at rest and percent myocardium showing mismatch.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.