Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:188-193
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonelli, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonelli, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, C. F.

False positive head-up tilt:

Hemodynamic and neurohumoral profile

Fabio M. Leonelli, MD, FACC* {ddagger}, Ke Wang, MD* {ddagger}, Joyce M. Evans, MS{dagger} {ddagger}, Abhijit R. Patwardhan, PhD{dagger} {ddagger}, Michael G. Ziegler, MD{ddagger} §, Andrea Natale, MD* {ddagger}, Charles S. Kim, BSE{dagger} {ddagger}, Kathleen Rajikovich, RN* {ddagger} and Charles F. Knapp, PhD{dagger} {ddagger}

* Department of Cardiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
{dagger} Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
{ddagger} Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
§ University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Changes in left ventricular end-systolic dimensions (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions (LVEDD), shortening fraction (SF), and rate of change of the same parameters during HUT in the three groups. Throughout the test, end-diastolic, end-systolic dimension, and SF did not change significantly in Group I. In Group II the LVEDD and the SF changed significantly from the baseline values but remained similar to Group I. In Group III all of these parameters changed from baseline; furthermore, the LVEDDs were different from Group I, and the SF was different from both groups. Although LVEDDs were comparable in Group II and Group III, the rate of change in Group III was different from the other two. *p < 0.05 versus Group I. {dagger}p < 0.05 from baseline. {ddagger}p < 0.05 versus baseline, Group I and II. mm = millimeters; min = minutes; HUT = head-up tilt; before = 1 or 2 min before the end of HUT.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Changes in epinephrine and norepinephrine plasma levels during head-up tilt. The three groups exhibited similar increases in norepinephrine levels during the test. The increase in epinephrine level during HUT was higher in Group III than in the other groups. {ddagger}p < 0.05 versus baseline, Group I and II. HUT = head-up tilt.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement