cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:698-706
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.

Acute and nine-month clinical outcomes after "suboptimal" coronary stenting

Results from the STent anti-thrombotic regimen study (STARS) registry

Donald E. Cutlip, MD, FACC*, Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC{dagger}, Kalon K. L. Ho, MD, MSc, FACC{ddagger}, Paul C. Gordon, MD, FACC§, Alessandro Giambartolomei, MD, FACC||, Daniel J. Diver, MD, FACC, David M. Lasorda, DO, FACC#, David O. Williams, MD, FACC**, Michelle M. Fitzpatrick, RN{ddagger}, April Desjardin, MS{ddagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, Richard E. Kuntz, MD, MSc{ddagger}, Donald S. Baim, MD, FACC{ddagger} for the STent Anti-thrombotic Regimen Study Investigators

* University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
{dagger} Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
{ddagger} Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
§ Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
|| St. Joseph’s Hospital, Syracuse, New York, USA
Georgetown Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
# Allegheny University Hospitals, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
** Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cumulative distribution frequency of percent diameter stenosis at baseline (pre) and after final stent postdilation (post). At baseline, there is no difference in stenosis severity for registry compared with randomized patients. The final diameter stenosis is slightly, but significantly, worse for registry patients.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Estimated freedom from TVF for registry compared with randomized patients. There is a significant increase in TVF events early for registry patients with further separation of the survival curves during the first year, consistent with increased frequency of periprocedural MI as well as later target vessel revascularization.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home