Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:191-196
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ommen, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tajik, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ommen, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tajik, A. J.

Comparison of dual-chamber pacing versus septal myectomy for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy1

A comparison of objective hemodynamic and exercise end points

Steve R. Ommen, MD*, Rick A. Nishimura, MD, FACC*, Ray W. Squires, PhD*, Hartzell V. Schaff, MD, FACC{dagger}, Gordon K. Danielson, MD, FACC{dagger} and A. Jamil Tajik, MD, FACC*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification from baseline to follow-up for patients undergoing surgical septal myectomy or dual-chamber (DDD) pacing.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Change in Doppler-derived resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient from baseline to follow-up assessment. Both groups (surgical myectomy, left; dual-chamber pacing, right) show significant reductions in resting gradient (p < 0.05).

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effects of treatment modalities on exercise duration. The surgical myectomy patients show a significant increase (*p < 0.05), whereas the pacing patients do not. Open bars = pretreatment; solid bars = posttreatment.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Effects of treatment modalities on peak oxygen consumption (VO2) in patients treated for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (*p < 0.05). Open bars = pretreatment; solid bars = posttreatment.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement