Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia in infancy and childhood
A multicenter study on clinical profile and outcome
Jean-Pierre Pfammatter, MDa,
Thomas Paul, MDa Working Group on Dysrhythmias and Electrophysiology of the Association for European Pediatric Cardiology
a Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Childrens Hospital, Berne, Switzerland

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Age distribution of the patients included in the study. Bars indicate absolute number of patients per year at first manifestation.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Antiarrhythmic drug treatment. Number of concomittant or consecutive antiarrhythmic agents given to the patients over the whole study period is shown.
|
|

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Effectiveness of the antiarrhythmic agents most frequently used. Bars indicate the relative success rates (hatched bars, partial effect; filled bars, complete success). Amio = amiodarone; Bbl = beta-blocker, Flec = flecainide; Prop = Propafenone; Sot = sotalol; Vera = verapamil.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Status of the study patients at last follow-up. Sixty-three percent of patients were free of ventricular tachycardia and free of drug treatment, including the seven patients who underwent successful catheter ablation.
|
|
|