This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schnell, G. B. Articles by Anderson, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schnell, G. B. Articles by Anderson, T. J.

Impaired brachial artery endothelial function is not predicted by elevated triglycerides

^a Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 Percent change in brachial artery diameter in response to reactive hyperemia (RH) and sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) in Group 1 (solid bars), and in the combination of Groups 2 and 3 (hatched bars). *p = 0.06, **p = 0.01.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Figure 2 Percent change in brachial artery diameter in response to reactive hyperemia (RH), and sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) in Group 1 (solid bars), Group 2 (open bars) and Group 3 (hatched bars). *p = 0.14; **p = 0.05.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Figure 3 Change in brachial artery flow at baseline and in response to reactive hyperemia (RH) in Group 1 (solid bars), Group 2 (open bars) and Group 3 (hatched bars). There was no difference in brachial artery flow between groups.