JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:1895-1902
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hohnloser, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mauß, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hohnloser, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mauß, O.

Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic value during long-term follow-up of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era

Stefan H. Hohnloser, MD, FACCa, Thomas Klingenheben, MDa, Markus Zabel, MDa, Matthias Schöpperl, MDa and Oliver Mauß, MSca

a Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Distribution of maximal length of nonsustained VT episodes.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier event probabilities for patients with a LVEF above and below 35%, considering the composite primary study end point.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier event probabilities for patients with a patent, compared with those with an occluded infarct-related, artery considering the composite primary study end point.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Top, Kaplan-Meier event probabilities for patients with a depressed, compared with those with preserved, HRV considering the composite primary study end point. Bottom, Kaplan-Meier event probabilities for patients with a depressed, compared with those with preserved, HRV considering the secondary study end point.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Top, Kaplan-Meier event probabilities for patients with, compared with those without, nonsustained VT considering the composite primary study end point. Bottom, Kaplan-Meier event probabilities for patients with, compared with those without, nonsustained; VT considering the secondary study end point. Note that there is no predictive value of nonsustained VT concerning sudden death or arrhythmic events.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.