Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:1870-1878
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishioka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishioka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R. J.

Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity

Comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging

Toshihiko Nishioka, MDa, Aman M. Amanullah, MD*, Huai Luo, MD*, Hans Berglund, MD*, Chong-Jin Kim, MD*, Tomoo Nagai, MD*, Naohiro Hakamata, MDa, Shuichi Katsushika, MDa, Akimi Uehata, MDa, Bonpei Takase, MDa, Kazushige Isojima, MDa, Daniel S. Berman, MD, FACC* and Robert J. Siegel, MD, FACC*

a Division of Cardiology, Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 154-8532, Japan
* Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA



View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Top panel: Longitudinal view of a schematic presentation of the lumen areas and the EEL (external elastic lamina) areas at the proximal reference site, lesion site and distal reference site. Middle panel: IVUS images from the proximal reference site, lesion site and distal reference site of a patient with a significant coronary stenosis. Bottom panel: Cross-sectional view of a schematic presentation of the lumen areas, wall and EEL areas at the proximal reference site, lesion site and distal reference site.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Scattergraph shows raw data of all lesion lumen areas correspondent to each mean reference EEL area. The dotted line (Y = 4.0) and the solid line (Y = 0.1X + 2.6) indicate the cutoff line that discriminates the SPECT (+) group from the SPECT (–) group. EEL, external elastic lamina; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography. Open circle = SPECT (+); solid circle = SPECT (–).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Scattergraph shows raw data of all lesion percent area stenoses correspondent to each EEL area ratio. The dotted line and solid line (Y = 0.23X + 47.0) indicate the cutoff value and line, respectively, which discriminates the SPECT (+) group from the SPECT (–) group. EEL, external elastic lamina; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography. Open circle = SPECT (+); solid circle = SPECT (–).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Scattergraph shows raw data of all luminal percent area stenoses correspondent to each mean reference percent area stenosis. The dotted line and solid line (Y = –0.21X + 68.0) indicate the cutoff value and line that discriminates the SPECT (+) group from the SPECT (–) group. SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography. Open circle = SPECT (+); solid circle = SPECT (–).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Scattergraph shows raw data of all corrected percent area stenoses correspondent to each mean reference percent area stenosis. The dotted line and solid line (Y = 0.24X + 66.0) indicate the cutoff value and line, which discriminates the SPECT (+) group from the SPECT (–) group. SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography. Open circle = SPECT (+); solid circle = SPECT (–).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement