Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:1610-1618
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mark, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mark, D. B.

Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting

Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH, FACC*, Patricia A. Cowper, PhD{dagger}, Elizabeth R. DeLong, PhD{dagger}, James P. Zidar, MD, FACC*, Richard S. Stack, MD, FACC* and Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH, FACC*

* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA and
{dagger} the Division of Biometry, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Displays mean baseline in-hospital costs for Stent (light bar) and PTCA (dark bar). It also displays mean 1–6 month and 7–12 month follow-up cardiac costs and cumulative six-month and one-year cardiac costs for each treatment.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Displays risk-adjusted one year cumulative cost estimates for patients receiving either a coronary stent or PTCA under three clinical scenarios: 1) a 60-year old patient without comorbid illness, 2) the same aged patient with diabetes mellitus, and 3) the same aged patient with multiple comorbid illnesses (diabetes, chronic lung disease, congestive heart failure, history of myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease). The solid squares mark the mean for each treatment under each scenario. The diamond and triangles represent the 75th and 25th percentile confidence intervals surrounding this mean estimate.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement