Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:697-704
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barillà, F.
Right arrow Articles by Campa, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barillà, F.
Right arrow Articles by Campa, P. P.

Recovery of contractility of viable myocardium during inotropic stimulation is not dependent on an increase of myocardial blood flow in the absence of collateral filling

Francesco Barillà, MD*, Giuseppe De Vincentis, MD{dagger}, Enrico Mangieri, MD*, Massimo Ciavolella, MD, PhD* {dagger}, Gaetano Pannitteri, MD*, Francesco Scopinaro, MD{dagger}, Giuseppe Critelli, MD* and Pietro Paolo Campa, MD*

* 2nd Section of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiac Surgery, University "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy
{dagger} Section of Nuclear Medicine, University "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Bar histograms comparing echocardiographic (top) and scintigraphic results (bottom) at baseline, during low dose dobutamine infusion and postoperatively (POST-REV), in patients with (group A) and without (group B) collaterals. The lack of significant changes in myocardial 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake after dobutamine infusion in patients without collaterals is clearly visible, in spite of a recovery of both function and perfusion detected after revascularization.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Example of echocardiographic and scintigraphic images obtained in a patient with collaterals (group A) at baseline, during low dose dobutamine infusion and after revascularization (POST-REV). In the top row, a left ventricular end-systolic frame obtained at echocardiographic study in the four-chamber view is shown. In the bottom row, a set of tomographic slices reconstructed along the short axis from left ventricular apex to base (a->d) is shown. The decrease in left ventricular end-systolic dimensions at both dobutamine and postrevascularization echocardiographic studies in comparison with the basal study is visible. The functional changes were associated with an increase in 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake detected at dobutamine scan in the areas of the previous infarction in comparison with basal scan, and confirmed after revascularization.

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Example of echocardiographic and scintigraphic images obtained in a patient without collaterals (group B) at baseline, during low dose dobutamine infusion and after revascularization (POST-REV) (image composed as in Fig. 2). The decrease in left ventricular end-systolic dimensions at both dobutamine and postrevascularization echocardiographic studies in comparison with the basal study is visible. Differently from the patient shown in Figure 2 (a patient with collaterals), no change in 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake in the infarcted area is visible at dobutamine scan in comparison with basal scan. A significant increase in tracer uptake was nevertheless detected after revascularization.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement