cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:654-660
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, H.
Right arrow Articles by Minamino, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, H.
Right arrow Articles by Minamino, T.

Intravenous nicorandil can preserve microvascular integrity and myocardial viability in patients with reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction

Hiroshi Ito, MD*, Yoshiaki Taniyama, MD*, Katsuomi Iwakura, MD*, Nagahiro Nishikawa, MD*, Tohru Masuyama, MD{dagger}, Tsunehiko Kuzuya{dagger}, Masatsugu Hori, MD{dagger}, Yorihiko Higashino, MD*, Kenshi Fujii, MD* and Takazo Minamino, MD*

* Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan
{dagger} First Department of Medicine, Osaka University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Comparison of frequency of MCE no reflow between nicorandil and control groups. Frequency of MCE no reflow was significantly lower in the nicorandil group than in the control group. Relative risk for MCE no reflow with nicorandil was 0.34. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home