cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:304-310
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farshi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farshi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, B. N.

Ventricular rate control in chronic atrial fibrillation during daily activity and programmed exercise: a crossover open-label study of five drug regimens

Ramin Farshi, MDa, Deborah Kistner, RNa, Jonnalagedda S. M. Sarma, PhD, FACCa, Jeffrey A. Longmate, PhD* and Bramah N. Singh, MD, PhD, FACCa

a Division of Cardiology, West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
* City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Circadian distribution of hourly mean VR in patients with CAF as influenced by various treatment regimens (Dig + dilt = digoxin + diltiazem; Dig + atn = digoxin + atenolol). The "hour of the day" refers to a 24 h clock with hour 0 being midnight. All regimens exhibited significant circadian variation of VR (p < 0.001). Digoxin and diltiazem given alone had similar overall rates during the 24 h. Compared with digoxin, atenolol alone and digoxin + atenolol markedly attenuated the circadian rhythmicity. Note that beta-blockade tended to shift the peak ventricular rate to a later time in the afternoon and the combination of digoxin and atenolol was the most effective regimen in reducing the ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation. See text for details.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Cosinor modeling of the circadian pattern of VR in patients with CAF for comparison of the effects of different treatments on the phase of the circadian patterns. The 24-h VR data of each subject were fitted to a cosine curve through a nonlinear regression analysis. The hourly mean VR data and the corresponding cosine curves of 4 cases representing typical, best, borderline accepted and rejected fits are presented. The time of peak ventricular rate from midnight was calculated from the estimated phase of the cosine fit. See Table 2 and the text for details.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effect of various pharmacologic regimens on exercise-induced VR in patients with CAF. There was a linear trend in increases in VR on all 5 regimens. The mean VR on digoxin + atenolol treatment was the lowest and was significantly lower than those on digoxin, diltiazem and digoxin + diltiazem. See text for details.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home