Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:2011-2017
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brochet, E.
Right arrow Articles by Assayag, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brochet, E.
Right arrow Articles by Assayag, P.

Early changes in myocardial perfusion patterns after myocardial infarction: relation with contractile reserve and functional recovery

Eric Brochet, MD*, Daniel Czitrom, MD*, Daniel Karila-Cohen, MD*, Patrick Seknadji, MD*, Marc Faraggi, MD, PhD{dagger}, Hakim Benamer, MD*, Pierre Aubry, MD*, Philippe Gabriel Steg, MD, FACC* and Patrick Assayag, MD*

* Department of Cardiology, Hopital Bichat, Paris, France
{dagger} Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hopital Bichat, Paris, France



View larger version (79K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Myocardial contrast echocardiograms (apical four chamber view) at day 0 (left) and day 9 (right) in a patient with anterior myocardial infarction. Left: Immediately after successful angioplasty of the left anterior descending artery (TIMI grade 3 flow), significant "no-reflow" phenomenon is observed in the risk area after injection of contrast medium in the left main coronary artery. Right: At day 9, a marked improvement in contrast pattern is observed in the area of initial no-reflow.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Temporal changes in individual segmental contrast pattern in the risk area between day 0 and day 9.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Bar graph showing serial changes in mean segmental wall motion score between day 0 (solid bars), day 9 (hatched bars) and follow-up (open bars) in the three groups of segments defined on the basis of changes in myocardial contrast echocardiographic pattern between day 0 and day 9.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Pie charts comparing the frequency of functional recovery at follow-up (A) or contractile improvement with dobutamine (B) in the three groups of segments defined on the basis of changes in myocardial contrast echocardiographic pattern between day 0 and day 9. CR+ (CR–) = presence (absence) of contractile reserve. (A) Open = recovery; solid = no recovery. (B) Open = CR+; solid = CR–.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Plots of contrast score index at day 0 and day 9 in the 28 patients (left). Plots of wall motion score index between day 0 and follow-up (right) in the 24 patients with follow-up studies. Mean values (circles) ±SD (vertical bars) are also shown.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement