Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1874-1880
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Vrey, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Vrey, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.

Serial volumetric (three-dimensional) intravascular ultrasound analysis of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy

Evelyn A. de Vrey, MD*, Gary S. Mintz, MD, FACC*, Clemens von Birgelen, MD{ddagger}, Takeshi Kimura, MD, FACC{dagger}, Masakiyo Noboyoshi, MD, FACC{dagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC*, Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FACC{ddagger} and Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC*

* Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
{dagger} Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
{ddagger} Thoraxcenter, University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, The Netherlands



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Schematic drawing of automated contour detection of lumen-tissue and media-adventitia boundaries in a coronary segment. The processing technique is based on the concept that longitudinal contours facilitate the automated contour detection on the cross-sectional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images by defining the center and the range of the boundary-searching process. After digitalization of a motorized IVUS video recording, two longitudinal sections (X,Y) are processed. The tissue-lumen and media-adventitia boundaries in these longitudinal sections are automatically traced. Subsequently, this information is used as points to define regions-of-interest in the cross-sectional image to guide a second automatic contour detection process. Finally, the volumetric results are calculated from the contour data of the cross-sectional IVUS images.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Plots showing individual IVUS measurements of external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen, and plaque+media (P+M) volumes postintervention (Post) and at follow-up (6 mo FU) in the entire cohort of 31 patients.

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 A serial (preintervention, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up) three-dimensional IVUS analysis is shown. Lesion length is plotted on the x-axis. The external elastic membrane (EEM) cross-sectional area over the length of the lesion is shown by the upper line, and the lumen cross-sectional area over the length of the lesion is shown by the lower line, and the plaque+media (P+M) cross-sectional area over the length of the lesion is shown by both the gray area and by the dark black line. Preintervention, the minimum lumen cross-sectional area, is at the 5-mm length marker. In this example, the increase in lumen during the directional atherectomy procedure (DCA) is almost entirely the result of a decrease in P+M cross-sectional area at the center of the lesion. At follow-up, the stenosis recurs with minimum lumen cross-sectional area again located at the 5-mm length marker. There has been a reduction in EEM cross-sectional area over the length of the lesion, but especially from the 0-mm to the 15-mm length marker. There has been no change in P+M cross-sectional area over the length of the lesion. Thus, recurrence was entirely the result of negative arterial remodeling (decrease in EEM).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 In the overall cohort of 31 lesions, the change in lumen volume correlated with the change in EEM volume from postintervention to follow-up (r = 0.842, p < 0.0001), but not with the change in P+M volume (r = 0.244, p = 0.186).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 In the 18 lesions from the SURE Trial over the time course of the study (representing three intervals per lesion for a total of 54 observations), the change in lumen volume (from postintervention to 24 h, from 24 h to 1 month, and from 1 to 6 months) correlated with the change in EEM volume (r = 0.903, p < 0.0001), but not with the change in P+M volume (r = 0.246, p = 0.073).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement