cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1811-1818
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Veldhuisen, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crijns, H. J. G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Veldhuisen, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crijns, H. J. G. M.

High- versus low-dose ACE inhibition in chronic heart failure

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of imidapril

Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, MD, PhD, FACCa,1, Sabine Genth-Zotz, MD*, Jan Brouwer, MD, PhDa, Frans Boomsma, PhD{dagger}, Tilo Netzer, PhD{ddagger}, Arie J. Man in ’t Veld, MD, PhD{dagger}, Yigal M. Pinto, MD, PhD||, K. I. Lie, MD, PhD§ and Harry J. G. M. Crijns, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiology/Thoraxcenter, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
* the II. Medical Clinic, Johannes Gutenberg-University Clinic, Mainz, Germany
{dagger} COEUR/Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
{ddagger} Clinical Research, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
|| the Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
§ the Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (A) Change after 12 weeks of treatment in exercise duration (s) in the four groups. *p < 0.05 vs. placebo; #p < 0.05 vs. 2.5-mg imidapril. A significant dose-response relation was observed by the linear trend test (p = 0.019). (B) Change after 12 weeks of treatment in physical (or pulse) working capacity (PWC) in watts at a heart rate of 110 beats/min (PWC110). *p < 0.05 vs. placebo. There was also a significant dose-response effect (p < 0.05).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Change after 12 weeks of treatment in plasma norepinephrine concentrations (in pg/ml), at rest (open bars) and peak exercise (solid bars). There are no significant differences. (B) Change after 12 weeks of treatment in plasma renin (µU/ml), at rest (open bars) and peak exercise (solid bars). *p < 0.05 vs. placebo; **p < 0.001 vs. placebo; #p < 0.05 vs. 2.5-mg imidapril. The dose-response relation was significant both at rest and during exercise (p < 0.05 by linear trend). (C) Change after 12 weeks of treatment in plasma ACE (in % from baseline), at rest (open bars) and peak exercise (solid bars). All differences are highly significant vs. placebo (p < 0.001) but there is no dose-response relation. (D) Change after 12 weeks of treatment in plasma BNP (pg/ml), at rest (open bars) and peak exercise (solid bars). *p < 0.05 vs. placebo. The effect on BNP is dose-dependent, both at rest and during exercise (both p < 0.05).

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home