Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1801-1808
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, A. D.

Effects of partial left ventriculectomy on left ventricular performance in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Zoran Popovic, MDa, Milutin Miric, MD, PhDa, Sinisa Gradinac, MDa, Aleksandar N. Neskovic, MDa, Ljiljana Jovovic, MD, PhDa, Ljiljana Vuk, MDa, Milovan Bojic, MD, PhDa and Aleksandar D. Popovic, MD, PhD, FESC, FACCa

a Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute and Belgrade University Medical School, Belgrade, Yugoslavia



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Relationship between LV volume indexes obtained by single-plane ventriculography (LVCG) and biplane two-dimensional echocardiography (ECHO).

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 LV end-systolic frames of a patient before (A) and after PLV (B). Note the change in LV volume and shape.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relationship between LV circumferential end-systolic stress (ESScirc) and LVEF before (closed circles) and after PLV (open triangles). The normal limits (±2 SEE, long dashes) for the control patients are shown for this relation. The figure shows that PLV shifts LVEF-end systolic relations in a parallel to control data.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Relationship between LVSWI and end-diastolic stress before and after PLV. Although there was no improvement in LVSWI, it was performed at significantly lower preload (p = 0.0014), compared to the values before PLV.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement