Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1787-1796
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jalowy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heusch, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jalowy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heusch, G.

Infarct size reduction by AT1-receptor blockade through a signal cascade of AT2-receptor activation, bradykinin and prostaglandins in pigs

Andreas Jalowy, MDa, Rainer Schulz, MDa, Hilmar Dörge, MDa, Matthias Behrends, MDa and Gerd Heusch, MD, FESC, FACCa

a Abteilung für Pathophysiologie, Zentrum für Innere Medizin des Universitätsklinikums Essen, Essen, Germany



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the four different experimental protocols.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Effect of candesartan on infarct size. Infarct size in percent of the area at risk was significantly reduced in the pigs receiving candesartan (filled bars) as compared to that of the placebo group (open bars) (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). In the relationships between infarct size and subendocardial blood flow, subendocardial blood flow in the area at risk correlated inversely to infarct size in the placebo (open squares) and the candesartan group (filled squares). Infarct size for any given subendocardial blood flow was significantly reduced in the candesartan group.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effect of candesartan on infarct size during AT2-receptor blockade. Infarct size in percent of the area at risk was not different in the pigs receiving PD123319 + candesartan (filled bars) as compared to that of the PD123319 group (open bars). The relationships between infarct size and subendocardial blood flow between the two groups were superimposable.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Effect of candesartan on infarct size during bradykinin B2-receptor blockade. Infarct size in percent of the area at risk was not different in the pigs receiving HOE140 + candesartan (filled bars) as compared to that of the HOE140-group (open bars). The relationships between infarct size and subendocardial blood flow between the two groups were superimposable.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Effect of candesartan on infarct size during cyclooxygenase inhibition. Infarct size in percent of the area at risk was not different in the pigs receiving indomethacin + candesartan (filled bars) as compared to that of the indomethacin group (open bars). The relationships between infarct size and subendocardial blood flow between the two groups were superimposable.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement