Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1326-1330
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matetzky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hod, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matetzky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hod, H.

The distinction between coronary and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy by clinical markers of reperfusion

Shlomi Matetzky, MDa, Dov Freimark, MDa, Pierre Chouraqui, MDa, Ilya Novikov, PhDa, Oren Agranat, MDa, Babeth Rabinowitz, MD, FACCa, Elieser Kaplinsky, MD, FACCa and Hanoch Hod, MD, FACCa

a Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Comparison of long-term (2-year) clinical outcome of patients with and without rapid ST-segment resolution. Open bars = patients with rapid ST{uparrow} resolution; solid bars = patients without rapid ST{uparrow} resolution.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement