Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1287-1294
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murakami, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murakami, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, M.

Inappropriate microvascular constriction produced transient ST-segment elevation in patients with syndrome X

Hironori Murakami, MD, PhDa, Kazuyuki Urabe, MD, PhDa and Mitsuhiro Nishimura, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiology, Tenshi Hospital (Franciscan Mission of Mary), Sapporo, Japan



View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Serial electrocardiographic changes in case 1. (A) Control electrocardiography at rest: (B) the transient ST-segment elevation; (C) after a 0.5-mg infusion of intracoronary NTG; (D) after a 10-mg infusion of intracoronary PVN.

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Serial electrocardiographic changes and coronary angiograms in case 2. (A) Control electrocardiography at rest; (B) the transient ST-segment elevation; (C) a control coronary angiogram; (D) a coronary angiogram during the ST-segment elevation.

 


View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Serial electrocardiography changes and coronary angiograms in case 3. (A) Control electrocardiography at rest. This electrocardiographic was obtained at the end of cardiac catheterization because ST-segment changes (B and C) were observed just after cardiac catheterization was begun. (B) A transient ST-segment depression; (C) the transient ST-segment elevation; (D) a control coronary angiogram; (E) a coronary angiogram during the ST-segment elevation.

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Coronary angiograms of the left coronary artery in case 1. (A) A control coronary angiogram; (B) a coronary angiogram during the ST-segment elevation; (C) a coronary angiogram after a 0.5-mg intracoronary NTG infusion; (D) a coronary angiogram after a 10-mg intracoronary PVN infusion.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Representative CBF profile of the LAD with a Doppler guide wire in case 1. (A) During the ST-segment elevation; (B) after an intracoronary infusion of 0.5 mg of NTG; (C) after an intracoronary infusion of 10 mg of PVN.

 


View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Representative light microscopic sections from the right ventricular myocardium with hematoxylin and eosin stain in case 1. (A) Typical perivascular fibrosis and fibromuscular dysplasia of the media were demonstrated (x400); (B) focal interstitial fibrosis and perinuclear halo of the myocardium were observed (x400).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement