cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1048-1055
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saoudi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Cribier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saoudi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Cribier, A.

Catheter ablation of atrioatrial conduction as a cure for atrial arrhythmia after orthotopic heart transplantation1

Nadir Saoudi, MD, FACCa, Michel Redonnet, MDa, Frederic Anselme, MDa, Hervé Poty, MDa and Alain Cribier, MD, FACCa

a Service de Cardiologie, Hopital Charles Nicolle, University of Rouen, Rouen, France



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Patient 1: intracardiac recordings during grafted right atrial sinus rhythm (upper panel) and recipient sinus rhythm (lower panel). In both cases the other atrium follows the dominant one. When the grafted sinus rhythm is dominant, the P wave is almost flat, its end is not discernible and the PR interval is 140 ms. On the other hand, when the recipient sinus rhythm takes over, the P wave and PR interval are tremendously distorted and prolonged (280 and 312 ms, respectively). RRA = recipient right atrium, GRA = grafted right atrium.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Patient 2: surface ECG pattern of atrial extrasystoles due to recipient to grafted atrioatrial conduction.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Patient 2: (A) Grafted atrial trigeminy due to regular capture by the recipient right atrium. (B) 1:1 conduction to the grafted right atrium during recipient incremental right atrial pacing at a cycle length of 500 ms. (C) Complete grafted-recipient atrioatrial dissociation during programmed stimulation of the grafted atrium with induction of common atrial flutter.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Patient 3: intracardiac recording of native to grafted (left) and grafted to native (right) atrioatrial conduction. HBE = His bundle electrogram. Two different P waves are observed as a function of the "leading" atrium.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Patient 3: induced atrial tachycardia with 2:1 and 1:1 atrioatrial conduction from the recipient to the grafted right atrium.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Patient 1: local electrogram at the successful ablation site during spontaneous grafted to recipient atrioatrial conduction. Proximal and distal recording bipoles of the ablation catheter are straddling the suture line based on electrogram amplitude (see text for discussion). Abl = ablation catheter recording bipole; d = distal, p = proximal.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Patient 1: complete atrioatrial dissociation after a single radiofrequency pulse.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8 Patient 2: pace mapping of atrioatrial conduction. Left panel: The pacing electrode is in the low recipient atrium. In the inferior leads a negative P wave is followed by an isoelectric component that precedes a positive P wave. The time separating the pacing artifact from the resulting grafted P wave is 180 ms. This suggests that the paced impulse had to first depolarize the recipient right atrium in an ascending fashion. After a delay due to slow conduction at an upper right atrial site, depolarization of the grafted right atrium then ensued descendingly. Right panel: the pacing electrode is now in the high recipient atrium close to the suture line at the successful ablation site. The resulting P wave follows the pacing spike without intervening initial negativity, and after a 50-ms delay.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9 Patient 3: disappearance of atrioatrial conduction within 2 s of the radiofrequency pulse during grafted atrial pacing at a cycle length of 520 ms. Note the change in P wave morphology with interruption of atrioatrial conduction. Complete electrical isolation of both atria is now visible on the surface electrocardiogram.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home